![]() ![]() You can't really expect anyone to buy a server that would provide such services, even if the software was available in an easy bundle. Web services are more difficult to replace. Every hardware company in town is producing tablets now, and DRM has been rejected by the general public. Replacements for the iPad and DRM are not difficult to find. Hopefully, this article will be well-received by the FSF, because it would be a shame to see this decades-old movement slowly die out. It avoids all the usual drama and simply analyzes why some FSF campaigns haven't been working lately. And I'll freely admit, I've advocated the pragmatic approach - because after more than 10 years of working in the community, it's clear that getting things done with a purist approach isnt working." In short, the free software philosophy seems to have gone out the window for most users and contributors. ![]() With very few exceptions, most companies that work in the community have settled on some mixture of proprietary and open source services to try to find a working revenue model. ![]() Most contributors I know see no problem with proprietary services like Dropbox and Ubuntu One. Party panic download free on linux mac os#But, when I look around at Linux events I see a sea of Mac OS X. " The free software movement, though, seems to be shrinking. He says that users aren't responding well to being told "No" (or "Gno" as he puts it in a little dig at the FSF), so those who want to push freedom need to provide realistic alternatives to things like iPads, DRM-encrusted media, proprietary "cloud" services, and so on. Over at Linux Magazine, Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier suggests a different course for the free software movement. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |